Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  118 / 316 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 118 / 316 Next Page
Page Background

AfrAsia Bank Limited and its Group Entities

Annual Report 2015

page 116

MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)

High expectations for a new growth model

In its 2015-2019 programme, the Government declared its objective to “transform Mauritius into a truly forward looking, environmentally

sustainable, economically vibrant and innovative country with modern infrastructure, global connectivity, high skills and technology.” Heavy

emphasis is laid on high-quality infrastructure to boost Mauritius’ productivity and competitiveness indicators. The infrastructure vision,

as elaborated in the Public Sector Investment Programme January 2015 - June 2019, is expected to cost some USD 4bn.

The policy agenda promising a ‘second economic miracle’ is expected to be largely based on social cohesion and inclusive growth.

Incidentally, the new government comprises the same Prime Minister and the same Finance Minister as during the ‘first economic miracle’.

The latter is often referred to in Mauritius as the period beginning in the mid-1980s and extending to the late 1990s. Between 1973 and

1999, despite low initial conditions, real GDP growth in Mauritius averaged 5.9% per year as compared with 2.4% in Africa. In terms of per

capita income, the achievements were 3.25% and about 0.7% respectively. As reported by Subramaniam and Roy, the income of the average

Mauritian has increased three and a half times over a forty-year period, while that of the average African has increased by 32%.

Renewed emphasis on governance

The authorities have vowed to lay heavy emphasis on governance and transparency in all their dealings. A new Ministry of Financial

Services, Good Governance and Institutional Reforms has been set up, which is proposing to enact several new legislations in 2015 and

2016 to strengthen governance, ethics and enhanced financial reporting in Mauritius and, above all, improve Mauritius’ rankings in the

World Governance Indicators as well as control of corruption.

GOVERNANCE EFFECTIVENESS, 1996-2013

VOICE AND ACCOUNTABILITY, 2005-2013

1996

1998

2000

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

0.0

0.5

-0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

Barbados

Mauritius

South Africa

Chile

Seychelles

Malaysia

Singapore

Barbados

OECD

Chile

Mauritius

South Africa

Singapore

Seychelles

Malaysia

-0.5

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

0

Score (-2.5 to 2.5)

2013

2005

Governance effectiveness, 1996-2013

Source: Worldwide Governance Indicators

Voice and accountability 2005-2015

Source: Worldwide Governance Indicators